Since posting last and as my obsession with the food industry grows, I've watched 2 more documentaries:
Here's what stood out from Hungry for Change:
- if you're not getting the specific nutrients your body needs in a way that it can easily digest it, then you're starving on a nutritional basis. You could eat 10 000 calories a day and still be hungry because your cells aren't getting the nourishment they need so they tell your brain you are still hungry.
- the will of self-responsibility is what is lacking in today's society. Steve and I have talked about this, why people smoke when they know it's bad for them, why we eat junk when we know it's bad for us, why people don't exercise when they know it's good for them. Why do we as a culture do that? We know what is best for us and what is bad for us, but we ignore the information we have. We know why we shouldn't do it but we have no idea why we're are doing it.
- MSG is in 80% of modern day processed foods. This chemical makes your brain want more food so you eat more than you need.
- 75 000 synthetic chemicals have been produced since 1940
- This is my favourite piece of information: the skin is the last organ to get nutrition so if the skin is healthy then you know the nutrients have gotten everywhere else. Right now my skin, hair, and nails are in the best condition they have been in every (aside from when I was pregnant).
I watched Genetic Roulette and learned:
- our bodies aren't ready for GMOs because the flora in our gut cannot activate them properly for digestion.
- GMO pesticide (roundup ready crops - herbicide) in food was found in 93% of pregnant women and 80% of their fetuses (Canadian study). These crops are nutritionally deficient and contain glyphosate which causes birth defects. Lab animals fed GMO soy had significant fertility issues, higher infant mortality rates. It was suggested that this is why we have seen such an Increase in fertility clinics in the past few decades.
- Leaky Gut is on the rise which is when food leaks into our bloodstream and antibodies are created against this food which leads to allergies and food intolerances. I cannot count how many conversations I've had where we wonder why everyone has so many allergies these days when we didn't know anyone allergic to peanuts or milk growing up. Maybe this is why? Doctors were saying that their patients' symptoms to allergies diminished when prescribed a non-GMO/organic diet. I have had allergies and asthma my whole life, severe when I was a child. I've outgrown my asthma, only having a minor attack here and there or if I have a bad chest cold but my allergies are always awful outside of winter. I haven't had to take a single allergy pill this Spring. I'm using taking 1 a day just to get by!
- animals who eat GMOs show Autistic traits such as anti-social behaviours and inflamed intestines which are similar to gut issues with children who have ASD. Modifying their diet to change their micro-flora can help, especially with behaviour.
- rGBH (bovine growth hormone) is a growth hormone in American milk. Walmart and Starbucks have banned any milk products containing it. It is also banned in 27 countries. Researchers believe this banning in major stores happened because of the increased knowledge that the public now has and they refused to buy milk with it in it. What consumers want, companies will provide. Demand for more organic and non-GMO items has made many companies change their formulas and practices. "While you can't control what was bought yesterday, by choosing non-GMO today will affect what you will be able to buy in the future."
- kids are more sensitive to GMOs bc their cells grow quicker than adults, they have higher respiratory rates, their immune systems are still developing, etc.
- I liked this quote: "Just because science can do something doesn't mean it should."
- research isn't allowed on GMO seeds unless it is conducted by the companies who produce them, like Monsanto. If an outside researcher tries, pressure from these companies ends up stopping the research. They get fired, their reputation is destroyed, companies threatens to sue, etc. In my mind, if there's nothing wrong with GMOs, why can't a third party do research on them? If it's not a problem to eat them, then why not label them so that the consumer can make their own choices?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
So I'm all happy on my organic/non-GMO train when a respected friend who is a nurse, yoga instructor, and certified trainer sent me an article that she received from a friend who has her PhD in a science related field. They had had a conversation about this topic recently and she thought I'd be interested in the article. It was entitled Is
Organic Agriculture "Affluent Narcissism?"
http://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymiller/2012/11/07/organic-agricultures-bitter-taste-or-is-organic-agriculture-affluent-narcissism/
Needless to say I was rather confused. Everything I had been reading and watching, what I thought was well-cited information, was being totally negated in this article. I emailed it to my naturopath who responded by saying that:
- There is so much research out there that any side can be supported if the writer knows where to look. He really echoes the argument I've heard/read many times against organic farming. That being said… he's also pro-GMO so this guy has a bias, obviously.
- he has a couple of things that are helping his argument:
1) There really isn't a lot of research on organic food and health. It's a new area of study and it won't be for another 20 years before we fully understand the positive impact it has.
2) Not all organic farms are created the same. Not all organic farming practices and their produce can be painted with the same brush… it's like comparing apples to oranges. He doesn't mention it, but he should… and at least give credit to the farmers who are doing it right and providing healthier produce for consumers.
- Every point in his article can be debated. I'm sure the people at the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP magazine) would easily disprove his argument with what their researchers keep finding over and over again in the field of Environmental Health.
- When it comes to organics, I do suggest "middle of the road" approach. Using EWG's "Dirty Dozen" list, buy those veggies and fruit organic because these have been found to have the highest chemical profiles. Everything else can be purchased regularly (EWG also has a "Clean 15" list of produce that have lowest levels).
I have a friend who since getting to know her, has really made me be more cognizant about what I buy and where I buy it from. I try to buy local when I can and also to go to family owned or small scale stores/restaurants even though they usually cost more. Her family has been involved in farming for many years and they own a fabulous winery here in Niagara. She very much supports buying local and has talked to me before about the pesticides used in organic farms. One thing I learned from the article above and from her is the use of copper and the differences in practice that can occur between various organic farms.
I asked my chiropractor yesterday what his thoughts were on organic food and he said he wished that they were more regulated and that it doesn't seem to be worth the price hike for food that ripens on it's way here. The food is not as nutritionally dense as local.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
I still go back to my university learnings about being critical of information before making a decision. Here's where my brain is sitting now:
- I think all studies have flaws and that longitudinal studies take so long that we cannot reap the benefits of this research until it is too late.
- I don't think qualitative research is given enough clout.
- Books and documentaries about Canadian food regulations are much harder to find compared to American.
- I think companies and marketers do an outstanding job advertising their products and are not beneath misleading claims to make money. Not all companies have the health of their customers at the top of their priority list. That being said, not all of them claim to either.
- I am going to refocus my shopping to prioritize local food and then organics based on the EWG's list, which is something I've seen referenced many times throughout the literature. I will continue to look for grass fed, hormone-free meat for my family even though I know those terms can be used as loosely as organic. It eases my mind even though it drains my bank account. For me, knowing I'm doing what I think at this time is the healthiest of choices, I guess that's all I can do.
Finally...education is the key to making change; whether that is for yourself, your family, or your community. Going with your instincts is important. There's a 40% placebo effect...the mind is powerful.